Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNguyen Thanh, Lam
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-21T04:05:31Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-20T07:38:38Z
dc.date.available2017-10-21T04:05:31Z
dc.date.available2018-06-20T07:38:38Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.other022002756
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.8.20.7:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2010
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this research is to review and analyze two significant theories of capital structure field which are the pecking order theory and the static trade-off theory. Employing a sample of 25 Vietnamese construction companies listed on Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange (HOSE) over a period from 2010 to 2014. This paper uses panel data based on the model of Shyam-Sunder & Myers (1999) and Chirinko & Singha (2000). The conclusions state that pecking order theory and static trade-off theory cannot illuminate behavioral finance in capitalizing of Vietnam construction firms. The pecking order’s semi strong form model explains financing behaviors of observed firms and indicates positive relationship between funds flow deficit and adjustment of issuing stock.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMSc. Le Dang Thuy Trangen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInternational University - HCMCen_US
dc.subjectFinancial institutionen_US
dc.titleTesting pecking order theory against static tradeoff theory : The case of construction companies listed on HOSE from 2010 to 2014en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record