dc.description.abstract | The identification and categorization of flaws is a fundamental necessity within the textile
industry. Inevitable challenges arise in manufacturing processes, often resulting in the
occurrence of faults or omissions in the produced goods throughout the knitting
process.Therefore, it is imperative to thoroughly address textile defects via inspection
activities in order to uphold high-quality standards.Fabric defect categorization refers to the
systematic process of identifying underlying assumptions within diverse datasets using
statistics and machine learning methodologies. The primary objective is to categorize fabrics
of superior quality and devoid of defects for distribution to clients. Therefore, the 3 methods
applied in this report are The Local Binary Patterns (LBP), The Gray Level Co-occurrence
Matrix (GLCM) and The Local Binary Patterns (LBP) combined with a Visual Geometry
Group (VGG16). The purpose of this paper is to compare and classify the effectiveness of
these three approaches in determining the most optimal solution for the classify defects in
fabrics.
The results show that using the Local method Binary pattern LBP combined with a Visual
Geometry Group (VGG16) produces the highest and most consistent fabric defect
classification results. The conclusive research demonstrates that Visual Geometry
Group(VGG) is an appropriate classifier for such issues. Specific faults are more easily
classifiable than others. For instance, unconnected corpus, hole, and oil satin are relatively
easy to categorize. In summary, the LBP technique is the most optimal approach for the
identification and classification of woven faults. | en_US |