Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHa, Thi Xuan Chi
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Ngoc Gia Han
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-11T07:38:14Z
dc.date.available2025-02-11T07:38:14Z
dc.date.issued2024-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://keep.hcmiu.edu.vn:8080/handle/123456789/6313
dc.description.abstractIn today’s highly competitive market in Vietnam, each company has high competition to attract and increase customer satisfaction. Their values and costs play a crucial role in determining their positions in the market, so companies are finding ways to optimize the delivery cost in the process of delivering products to customers. The construction materials industry is a highly competitive industry with many companies and stores having many different prices, suppliers struggle with scheduling to deliver products promptly to clients. The research will be expanded to the multi-depot VRP with the purpose is planning the optimal or near-optimal routes to minimize the total cost of delivery. This study employs the Mixed-integer Linear Programming mathematical model and heuristic Genetic Algorithm to plan routes as well as ensure products are arranged according to requirements. In this study, material stores deliver goods through a third-party transport company, and the delivery planning considers some regulations such as routing, capacity limitations, demand of customers, weight of products, or distance. In this study, I compare the costs between two methods, called the MILP method and the GA method, based on the results from the first run. The total cost of delivery of the MILP method is 6,451,602 VND, while the GA method is 5,044,450 VND. The average difference between the two methods, calculated as a percentage is 24.48%, representing the difference in total cost of these two methods. The results show a clear difference between two research methods with the same data set, but these two methods produce results based on the same processing process. However, the results may be altered by changes in the values of other factors that present these in the sensitivity analysis. In general, GA brings a lower total cost of delivery than CPLEX, but in terms of aspects such as accuracy and running time, CPLEX offers more advantages. How to minimize the total cost of delivery in the MDVRP problem, by developing an effective mathematical model and algorithm?en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectVehicle Routing Problemen_US
dc.subjectMILPen_US
dc.subjectGenetic algorithmen_US
dc.subjectconstruction materialen_US
dc.subjectmulti-depoten_US
dc.subjectsplit deliveryen_US
dc.titleMulti-Depot Vehicle Routing Problem For Delivery Of The Material: A Case Study In The Construction Company In Vietnamen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record