| dc.description.abstract | This thesis examines professional decision-making for university majors in Industrial
Engineering and Management (IEM) using various Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
(MCDM) techniques. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is fundamental to this
research since it determines the weight of numerous variables considered important
when choosing a professional path. These parameters are then used to evaluate various
career selection in the IEM area. This weighted analysis then serves as the foundation
for subsequent assessments utilizing four MCDM methods: ELECTRE, TOPSIS,
VIKOR, and PROMETHEE. . Each method provides a distinct strategy to rating and
selecting jobs based on the AHP's requirements. Data was collected mostly through a
structured survey of undergraduate and graduate students. The survey was divided into
two parts: paired comparison questions using the AHP scale and an assessment of
various job alternatives based on predefined criteria.
This extensive use of MCDM methodologies creates a strong framework for supporting
IEM students in making informed and planned career choices. The findings are intended
to demonstrate the practical consequences of each strategy and provide a comparative
analysis of their usefulness in influencing career decisions. Finally, this study
contributes to the larger field of career advising by combining complicated decision making techniques with individual career planning in industrial engineering and
management. | en_US |
